Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed items were capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and eligible for Modvat credit.
Analysis: The disputed goods were electrical and electronic items used for transmission, distribution and control of electricity, and for making or breaking circuits and monitoring system parameters. The denial of credit rested on the view that the goods could not themselves bring about change in any substance or be used in manufacture. Following the Larger Bench view that control panels and transformers used to transmit and control electricity fall within the ambit of capital goods under Rule 57Q, the contrary view relied on in the impugned order was not accepted.
Conclusion: The disputed items were capital goods under Rule 57Q and were entitled to Modvat credit.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded on the question of Modvat credit eligibility.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used for transmission and control of electricity, including control panels and similar electrical equipment, can qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q for Modvat credit purposes.