Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on X-ray films, flow guide developers, flow guide dye penetrants, steel shots, graphite stopper heads, carbon dioxide and refractories.
Analysis: The items were held to be eligible inputs for Modvat credit on the basis of earlier Tribunal decisions. X-ray films were recognised as eligible inputs, and the associated flow guide developers and dye penetrants were treated as inputs used for X-ray purposes and as goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. Steel shots were accepted as inputs. Graphite stopper heads were treated as part of machinery and not falling within the excluded category under Rule 57A. Carbon dioxide and refractories were also covered by prior decisions allowing credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items.