<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91772</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on X-ray films, flow guide developers, flow guide dye penetrants, steel shots, graphite stopper heads, carbon dioxide and refractories because earlier Tribunal decisions had already recognised these items as eligible inputs. X-ray films and the related developers and dye penetrants were regarded as inputs used for X-ray purposes and goods used in or in relation to manufacture; steel shots were accepted as inputs; graphite stopper heads were treated as machinery parts and not excluded under Rule 57A; and carbon dioxide and refractories were also covered by prior rulings. Credit was therefore allowed on all disputed items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 254 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91772</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was treated as admissible on X-ray films, flow guide developers, flow guide dye penetrants, steel shots, graphite stopper heads, carbon dioxide and refractories because earlier Tribunal decisions had already recognised these items as eligible inputs. X-ray films and the related developers and dye penetrants were regarded as inputs used for X-ray purposes and goods used in or in relation to manufacture; steel shots were accepted as inputs; graphite stopper heads were treated as machinery parts and not excluded under Rule 57A; and carbon dioxide and refractories were also covered by prior rulings. Credit was therefore allowed on all disputed items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>