Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sulphuric acid used in the cooling tower for controlling the pH level of water used in the ammonia and urea plants was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 81/75-C.E. dated 22-3-1975.
Analysis: The Tribunal treated the dispute as covered by its earlier order in the assessee's own case. It noted that the notification exempts sulphuric acid intended for use in the manufacture of fertilisers, and that the acid used in the cooling tower was employed in relation to the fertiliser manufacturing process. The Tribunal also followed its earlier decisions holding that sulphuric acid used in a fertiliser plant qualifies for the benefit of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 81/75-C.E. dated 22-3-1975, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Sulphuric acid used in a cooling tower as part of the fertiliser manufacturing process is eligible for exemption under the notification granting relief to sulphuric acid intended for use in the manufacture of fertilisers.