Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether multi-neck spherical vessels and cylindrical vessels were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 52/86-C.E. where the vessels were produced by the mouth blown process but the necks were attached by heating.
Analysis: The deciding factor was the character of the goods and the manufacturing process applied to produce the vessels. The attachment of necks by heating did not change the character of the vessels already formed by the mouth blown process. The wording of the relevant serial entries in the notification was also read as supporting the assessee's case, since the exemption was not confined by the additional restrictive expression relied upon by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The vessels remained eligible for the exemption under the notification. The Revenue's challenge failed.