<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91452</link>
    <description>Multi-neck spherical vessels and cylindrical vessels made by the mouth blown process remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 52/86-C.E. The attachment of necks by heating did not alter the character of the goods as already formed, and the relevant serial entries were read as not imposing the additional restrictive condition urged by the Revenue. The assessee was therefore entitled to the notification benefit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91452</link>
      <description>Multi-neck spherical vessels and cylindrical vessels made by the mouth blown process remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 52/86-C.E. The attachment of necks by heating did not alter the character of the goods as already formed, and the relevant serial entries were read as not imposing the additional restrictive condition urged by the Revenue. The assessee was therefore entitled to the notification benefit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>