Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and for stay of recovery pending appeal; whether the amounts claimed towards freight, turn-over tax, sales tax, bank charges and transit damage were eligible for consideration at the stay stage.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted reliance on the Board circular regarding equalised freight in multi-product and multi-locational factories, and treated Chartered Accountant's certificates as prima facie evidence of actual payment of turn-over tax, equalised freight and sales tax. It also took note of the departmental position that such certificates were being accepted in some cases, the partial payment already made, the bank guarantee furnished, and the contention that the demand might reduce on verification of a calculation mistake. Reference was also made to the Supreme Court authority allowing deduction of bank charges for collection of sales proceeds.
Outcome: The appellants were held to have made out a prima facie case for waiver. The requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, the bank guarantee was directed to be kept alive during the pendency of the appeal, and recovery was stayed.