<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 246 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91375</link>
    <description>Prima facie evidence from Chartered Accountant certificates, the Board circular on equalised freight in multi-product and multi-locational factories, and the accepted departmental practice justified waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal also noted partial payment, a furnished bank guarantee, and a possible reduction in demand on verification of a calculation error, which supported stay protection. Bank charges were treated as a relevant deduction on the strength of Supreme Court authority. On these materials, the appellants were held to have made out a prima facie case, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, recovery was stayed, and the bank guarantee was ordered to remain alive during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:04:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 246 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91375</link>
      <description>Prima facie evidence from Chartered Accountant certificates, the Board circular on equalised freight in multi-product and multi-locational factories, and the accepted departmental practice justified waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal also noted partial payment, a furnished bank guarantee, and a possible reduction in demand on verification of a calculation error, which supported stay protection. Bank charges were treated as a relevant deduction on the strength of Supreme Court authority. On these materials, the appellants were held to have made out a prima facie case, the pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with, recovery was stayed, and the bank guarantee was ordered to remain alive during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>