Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a trust created with an unrestricted power of revocation by the settlor constitutes a gift liable to gift-tax.
Analysis: The statutory concept of a gift under the Gift-tax Act required a transfer by one person to another made voluntarily and without consideration, and the scheme of valuation under section 6 proceeded on the footing that the donor had at least partially and for a period divested himself of the property. A trust under which the settlor reserved an unlimited power to revoke at any time did not effect a complete divestment of the property. The Court treated irrevocability, in this context, as part of the essential legal concept of a gift and held that a trust valid under trust law did not thereby become a gift for gift-tax purposes merely because property had been settled in trust. The alternate contention based on section 6(2) was not accepted, as that provision was confined to gifts not revocable for a specified period.
Conclusion: Such a revocable trust with an unrestricted power of revocation does not amount to a gift within the meaning of the Gift-tax Act, and is not liable to gift-tax.
Ratio Decidendi: For gift-tax purposes, a transfer is not a taxable gift unless the donor has effectively and irrevocably divested himself of the property, at least for a determinable period; an unrestricted power of revocation negates the complete divestment necessary to constitute a gift.