Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a transfer of jewellery made subject to revocation after a specified period constituted a gift chargeable to gift-tax, and whether its value had to be determined under the statutory valuation provision.
Analysis: The transfer deed showed a complete divestment of the property for seventy-four months, during which the donor had no right to revoke and the donee was entitled to hold and deal with the jewellery as owner. The Court distinguished revocation at the donor's mere will from a transfer that is irrevocable for a specified period, and held that the latter falls within the statutory scheme dealing with gifts not revocable for a specified period. The absence of a separate definition of irrevocable transfer in the Gift-tax Act did not exclude such a transaction from the charging provisions. The Court further held that the value of such a gift had to be computed under the prescribed valuation rule, and that the objection that no income arose during the relevant period was a matter to be considered by the assessing authority in the first instance.
Conclusion: The transfer was liable to be treated as a gift for purposes of gift-tax under the provision dealing with gifts not revocable for a specified period, and the valuation had to be worked out under the prescribed rule.
Ratio Decidendi: A gift that is irrevocable for a specified period, though revocable thereafter, is a taxable gift within the statutory scheme, and its value must be determined according to the prescribed valuation method.