Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a continuous flow water purifier fitted on a water pipeline, without storage capacity, qualified for exemption under the notifications applicable to water filters of capacity not exceeding 40 litres.
Analysis: The exemption notifications identified a specific category of water filters by reference to their storage capacity and contemplated filters of a particular configuration in which water is held and then drawn after filtration. The product in question operated as a continuous purification device, had no holding or storage capacity, and could not satisfy the capacity parameter embedded in the notifications. Once the exempted product is identified by specific parameters, those parameters must be applied as written and cannot be expanded by resort to general domestic use or to a liberal interpretation that overrides the express limitation.
Conclusion: The product did not fall within the exemption notifications and the claim for exemption failed.