Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 163 of 1965 exempted packing and wrapping paper manufactured by an existing factory from its entire production or only to the extent attributable to enlarged capacity.
Analysis: The notification had to be read as a whole, not by isolating the phrase "any factory commencing production". The table in the notification created two distinct categories: factories commencing production after the relevant date and existing factories with enlarged capacity. The expression "commencing production" in the first category referred to a factory beginning production of the exempted goods, and the scheme of the notification showed that an existing factory was entitled to exemption only to the extent of production attributable to enlarged capacity. The Court also held that the exemption notification could not be construed in a way that produced discrimination or incongruous results. The principle of liberal construction applied only after the assessee first brought the claim within the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption only for production attributable to enlarged capacity, and not for production falling within the existing capacity.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be strictly construed at the stage of determining coverage, and only after the subject clearly falls within it can the exemption be given a liberal construction; the notification, read as a whole, limited the benefit to enlarged capacity in the case of an existing factory.