Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery proceedings in view of an earlier Tribunal order on the same exemption notification, and whether the goods cleared as cabs could be distinguished from taxis for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 162/86.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the dispute had already been considered in an earlier order and that any factual distinction between cabs and taxis could be examined at the stage of regular hearing. For the limited purpose of the stay application, the Tribunal found that the applicants had made out a strong prima facie case.
Outcome: Unconditional stay was granted and pre-deposit was waived.