<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal treated an earlier order on the same exemption notification as giving the applicants a strong prima facie case for stay purposes, and held that any factual distinction between cabs and taxis could be examined at the regular hearing. On that limited basis, it granted unconditional stay of recovery and waived pre-deposit pending disposal of the dispute under Notification No. 162/86.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 228 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal treated an earlier order on the same exemption notification as giving the applicants a strong prima facie case for stay purposes, and held that any factual distinction between cabs and taxis could be examined at the regular hearing. On that limited basis, it granted unconditional stay of recovery and waived pre-deposit pending disposal of the dispute under Notification No. 162/86.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>