Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on waste arising during machining of forgings when the work was carried out under Rule 57F(2) and the Modvat credit relatable to the waste had been debited by the supplier.
Analysis: The appellants followed the procedure under Rule 57F(2). The record showed that the supplier of the forgings had debited the Modvat credit attributable to the waste arising in the machining process. In such circumstances, the matter was governed by the principle that reversal of Modvat credit satisfies the requirement for availing the exemption, and duty demand on the waste could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The duty demand on the waste was unsustainable and the finding was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the duty demand was set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Modvat credit relatable to the waste is validly reversed or debited in accordance with the prescribed procedure, duty cannot be demanded again on the same waste.