Mutilation and scrap assessment of imported used pipes required where goods were substantially rusted and unusable.

Imported old, used and rusted pipes declared as heavy melting steel scrap were to be mutilated before clearance and assessed on a scrap basis where examination showed them to be substantially unusable. The text notes that the importer sought mutilation immediately after inspection and that earlier customs guidance contemplated mutilation of serviceable goods found in such consignments. On that footing, the proper treatment was assessment as steel scrap after mutilation, and not classification and valuation as serviceable pipes. The confiscation-based approach treating the goods as pipes was not sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether imported old, used and rusted pipes, declared as heavy melting steel scrap, should have been permitted to be mutilated and assessed as scrap rather than treated as serviceable pipes.

Analysis: The imported material was found to consist substantially of old, used and rusted pipes, and the importer had sought mutilation immediately after examination. The record also showed that the Board had earlier indicated, in consultation with the customs authorities at Kandla, that where serviceable goods were noticed they were to be mutilated into scrap and assessed accordingly. In these circumstances, the authority ought to have allowed mutilation before clearance, and the post-mutilation valuation had to be on the basis of scrap and not as pipes.

Conclusion: The imported goods were required to be mutilated and assessed as steel scrap; the confiscation-based treatment as serviceable pipes was not sustained.

---