Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denaturant contained in denatured ethyl alcohol could be excluded while extending the benefit of the money credit scheme under Notification No. 231/87-C.E. issued under Rule 57K of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The notification granted credit on ethyl alcohol used as raw material for specified final products. Denatured ethyl alcohol remained ethyl alcohol for the purposes of the tariff heading, and denaturation was only the process of rendering alcohol unfit for beverage use. Since the finished input was denatured ethyl alcohol, the quantity of denaturant formed part of that input and could not be segregated for denying credit. The demand was therefore not sustainable on merits, and the limitation plea was not examined.
Conclusion: The exclusion of the denaturant from denatured ethyl alcohol for the purpose of denying credit was not justified, and the demand was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification grants credit on denatured ethyl alcohol as an eligible input, the denaturant added to render the alcohol unfit for beverage use cannot be separately deducted to deny the statutory benefit.