<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89735</link>
    <description>Denatured ethyl alcohol remained eligible for money credit under Notification No. 231/87-C.E. because denaturation only renders alcohol unfit for beverage use and does not change the character of the input for tariff purposes. The denaturant added to produce denatured ethyl alcohol formed part of the eligible input and could not be separately excluded to deny credit. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable on merits, and the limitation issue was left unexamined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:41:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 303 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89735</link>
      <description>Denatured ethyl alcohol remained eligible for money credit under Notification No. 231/87-C.E. because denaturation only renders alcohol unfit for beverage use and does not change the character of the input for tariff purposes. The denaturant added to produce denatured ethyl alcohol formed part of the eligible input and could not be separately excluded to deny credit. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable on merits, and the limitation issue was left unexamined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>