Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether IC engines specially designed for use in diesel hydraulic locomotive shunters are classifiable under Tariff Item 29(1) of the Schedule to the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff as engines designed for use as prime movers for transport vehicles, or under Tariff Item 29(2) as other engines.
Analysis: Tariff Item 29(1) applies to IC engines designed for use as prime movers for transport vehicles and having special shape, size or quality for that purpose. The engines in question were admittedly meant for use in loco shunters. The only dispute was whether loco shunters could be treated as transport vehicles. The view accepted by the appellate authority was that a shunter transports goods from one place to another and therefore answers the description of a vehicle and, in the context of Tariff Item 29, a transport vehicle. The Tribunal agreed with that reasoning and found no reason to interfere.
Conclusion: The engines were correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 29(1) of the Schedule to the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, and the assessee's appeal failed.