<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89500</link>
    <description>IC engines specially designed for diesel hydraulic locomotive shunters were treated as engines for use as prime movers for transport vehicles under Tariff Item 29(1), because a shunter was regarded as a vehicle used to transport goods from one place to another. The Tribunal accepted that reasoning and distinguished such engines from the residual category of other engines under Tariff Item 29(2). On that basis, the engines were correctly classified under Tariff Item 29(1) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 146 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89500</link>
      <description>IC engines specially designed for diesel hydraulic locomotive shunters were treated as engines for use as prime movers for transport vehicles under Tariff Item 29(1), because a shunter was regarded as a vehicle used to transport goods from one place to another. The Tribunal accepted that reasoning and distinguished such engines from the residual category of other engines under Tariff Item 29(2). On that basis, the engines were correctly classified under Tariff Item 29(1) of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>