Limitation under Rule 57-I referred to Supreme Court after earlier references on the same legal question.

The limitation question under Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was treated as a substantial question of law already the subject of earlier references concerning its interaction with Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Because the same issue had already been referred to the Supreme Court in prior matters, the Tribunal followed that course rather than deciding the point anew. The reference application was allowed and the limitation issue was sent to the Supreme Court for determination through the President of the Tribunal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the question of law arising from the limitation applicable to Rule 57-I of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 should be referred to the Supreme Court instead of the High Court.

Analysis: The Tribunal noted that similar questions on the interaction between Rule 57-I and Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 had already been referred to the Supreme Court in earlier matters. It also noted that the issue had been considered in prior decisions, but those decisions pre-dated the references already made on the same question. In that circumstance, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to follow the earlier references and send the present question to the Supreme Court through the President of the Tribunal under the relevant reference provision.

Conclusion: The question was referred to the Supreme Court.

Final Conclusion: The reference application was allowed and the limitation issue under Rule 57-I was sent for decision by the Supreme Court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the same substantial question of law had already been referred to the Supreme Court in earlier matters, the Tribunal followed that course and made a further reference on the same issue.

---