Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the forgings manufactured by the appellant were classifiable under Heading 72.08 or under sub-heading 7308.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: Heading 72.08 covered pieces roughly shaped by rolling or forging of iron and steel. The record did not show that the goods had been machined or had gone beyond the stage of proof machining. The material on record, including the technical opinion placed before the Tribunal, supported the position that forgings attain only a rough shape at the forging stage and acquire final dimensional accuracy only after machining. The comparative samples also indicated that the goods were still in the rough forged stage and were not finished articles of iron or steel.
Conclusion: The forgings were correctly classifiable under Heading 72.08 and not under sub-heading 7308.90, and the appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.