TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the amended Explanation to Rule 57Q, inserting the disputed items as capital goods, operated retrospectively so as to extend Modvat credit to items procured before the amendment; and (ii) whether the pH Meter was eligible for Modvat credit as equipment used in relation to manufacture.
Issue (i): whether the amended Explanation to Rule 57Q, inserting the disputed items as capital goods, operated retrospectively so as to extend Modvat credit to items procured before the amendment.
Analysis: The amendment was treated as clarificatory rather than substantive. On that basis, and following earlier Tribunal rulings holding that the substituted Explanation to Rule 57Q was retrospective in effect, the exclusion based only on the date of purchase could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The disputed items were held eligible for Modvat credit and the denial was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the pH Meter was eligible for Modvat credit as equipment used in relation to manufacture.
Analysis: The pH Meter was accepted as being used for testing the quality of water and aerated water in the manufacturing process. It was therefore treated as an item used in relation to manufacture and covered by the subsequent clarification under Rule 57Q.
Conclusion: The pH Meter was held entitled to Modvat credit in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on both the retrospective applicability of the amended capital goods entry and the eligibility of the pH Meter, resulting in grant of consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A clarificatory amendment to the capital goods definition under Rule 57Q applies retrospectively, and equipment used for quality testing in the manufacturing process can qualify for Modvat credit as being used in relation to manufacture.
TaxTMI 
