Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adhesive paste or glue prepared by the assessee, having a short shelf life and being unstable in the form in which it emerged, was marketable and therefore excisable.
Analysis: The Chemical Examiner's report showed that the product lost adhesive properties within 24 hours, required re-mixing before use, was unstable, had a short shelf life, and was not marketable in that state. The departmental challenge did not dislodge the correctness of that report or show that the goods were capable of being marketed in the form in which they arose. In these circumstances, the settled legal position that manufacture and marketability are essential tests for excisability governed the matter.
Conclusion: The product was not excisable in the form in which it emerged, and the departmental appeals failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were sustained because the product lacked marketability in its existing state, so excise duty could not be fastened on it as such.
Ratio Decidendi: A product is not excisable unless it is the result of manufacture and is marketable in the form in which it emerges.