Exemption denial for brass dross: notification exclusion for ash and residue of copper covered the claimed goods.

Notification No. 493/86 did not extend exemption to brass dross or brass ash falling under Heading 26.20 where Serial No. 6 expressly excluded ash and residue of copper, including dross. The Tribunal treated brass ash as a residuary item and accepted that the same exclusion applied to brass dross, rejecting a trade-based distinction between copper and brass. On that construction, the claimed concessional treatment was unavailable and the denial of relief was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether brass dross or brass ash and residue was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 493/86 despite the exclusion in Serial No. 6.

Analysis: The imported goods were brass dross falling under Heading 26.20. Serial No. 6 of Notification No. 493/86 exempted only certain goods under Heading 26.20 and specifically excluded ash and residue of copper, including dross. Relying on the earlier Tribunal view that brass ash was a residuary item and that concessional treatment under the notification was unavailable, the Tribunal held that the notification did not extend the exemption to brass ash or brass dross. The argument based on a trade distinction between copper and brass was not accepted.

Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 493/86 was not available to the appellant for brass dross.

Final Conclusion: The import was held outside the scope of the claimed exemption and the adjudication denying relief was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification specifically excludes ash and residue of copper, including dross, a claim to exemption for brass dross or brass ash will fail if the goods fall within the excluded residuary category under the tariff entry.

---