Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 173Q(1)(bb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was justified where Modvat credit was taken on an undeclared final product, but the availment was reflected in statutory returns and the duty was voluntarily debited before issuance of the show cause notice.
Analysis: The return filings and classification list disclosed the utilisation of Modvat credit, and the assessee had itself reversed the wrongly availed credit by debiting the duty in the Personal Ledger Account before the demand was pursued. In the circumstances, the Tribunal followed its earlier decisions holding that non-filing of a separate declaration, when the availment is otherwise reflected in the statutory records, does not warrant invocation of the extended period or penal action on the same facts. The Court treated the case as one of procedural lapse rather than deliberate suppression.
Conclusion: Penalty was not sustainable and was set aside.