Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product "Marblex Flooring Tiles" was classifiable as articles of plastics under Chapter 39 or under Chapter 68.07 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The composition of the goods was found to be materially unchanged from the earlier proceedings in which the same product had been held not to be an article of plastic. The controlling test applied was whether plastic constituted the principal and predominant ingredient of the goods. The reasoning earlier approved by the higher court was that plastic used only as a binding agent, with the bulk of the composition consisting of non-plastic materials, did not make the product an article made of plastic. The later tariff structure was held to preserve the same essential classification scheme, and nothing in the departmental appeal rebutted the binding effect of the earlier decision or established any admission in the advertisement relied upon by the Revenue.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable as articles of plastics under Chapter 39 and the classification under Chapter 68.07 was upheld. The Revenue's appeal failed.