<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87420</link>
    <description>Marblex Flooring Tiles were classified under Chapter 68.07, not as articles of plastics under Chapter 39, because plastic was found to be only a binding agent and not the principal or predominant ingredient. The composition was materially unchanged from the earlier proceedings, and the controlling classification test remained whether the goods were essentially made of plastic. The later tariff structure did not alter that essential scheme, and the Revenue did not displace the earlier binding reasoning or establish any admission in the advertisement relied upon. The classification under Chapter 68.07 was therefore upheld and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:58:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=124487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 147 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87420</link>
      <description>Marblex Flooring Tiles were classified under Chapter 68.07, not as articles of plastics under Chapter 39, because plastic was found to be only a binding agent and not the principal or predominant ingredient. The composition was materially unchanged from the earlier proceedings, and the controlling classification test remained whether the goods were essentially made of plastic. The later tariff structure did not alter that essential scheme, and the Revenue did not displace the earlier binding reasoning or establish any admission in the advertisement relied upon. The classification under Chapter 68.07 was therefore upheld and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=87420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>