Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether molybdenum wire used in the manufacture of electric bulbs is an eligible input for Modvat credit or falls within the excluded category of apparatus, appliance or tool under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that the use of molybdenum wire is a technical necessity in the manufacture of the bulb filament and that such use is in or in relation to manufacture. It also relied on the Board's clarification that molywire used in electric bulbs is an input because it is consumed in the process. The Tribunal held that the term "tool" does not cover wire as used, and applied the larger Bench reasoning that the excluded expressions such as apparatus, appliance and tool must be understood in their ordinary technical sense and not so broadly as to deny credit on consumable items necessary for manufacture.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible on molybdenum wire used in electric bulbs, and the departmental view denying credit was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: An item consumed as a technical necessity in the manufacture of the final product, and not answering the ordinary meaning of apparatus, appliance or tool, remains an eligible input for Modvat credit.