Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Triethylene Glycol used for cleaning the filtering equipment in the manufacture of polyester film, fibre and yarn was an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. (ii) Whether tungsten wire used in the manufacturing process was an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Issue (i): Whether Triethylene Glycol used for cleaning the filtering equipment in the manufacture of polyester film, fibre and yarn was an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The cleaning of equipment through which the polymer passes was treated as an essential step in the manufacturing process and as activity done in relation to manufacture. The use of Triethylene Glycol for such cleaning did not change its character as an input, because without the cleaning process the manufacturing activity would not continue. The rule was applied broadly to cover materials used in relation to manufacture and not only those physically consumed in the final product.
Conclusion: Triethylene Glycol was held to be an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether tungsten wire used in the manufacturing process was an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Tungsten wire was treated as part of the manufacturing process and not as a tool or appliance falling within the exclusion clause. The reasoning adopted the view that wire used in the process of manufacture could qualify as an input, and the later Larger Bench decision did not displace that position. The alternate characterisation as capital goods was not required to decide the claim.
Conclusion: Tungsten wire was held to be entitled to input credit under Rule 57A, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Both disputed items were recognised as creditable inputs, and the impugned order was set aside with the appeals succeeding in full.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials used in relation to manufacture, including for essential cleaning of manufacturing equipment, may qualify as inputs for Modvat credit unless they fall squarely within the statutory exclusion for tools or appliances.