Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the restriction in Notification No. 177/86-C.E. on Modvat credit to Rs. 800 per metric tonne applied to credit taken on additional duty of customs paid on imported paper used in the manufacture of electric wires and cables.
Analysis: The notification defined "specified duty" for certain purposes, but in the relevant proviso dealing with paper and paper board the additional duty of customs was not expressly included among the duties whose credit was to be capped. The omission was treated as deliberate. The additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was also not to be treated as CVD for the purpose of imposing the stated restriction.
Conclusion: The credit restriction did not apply to additional duty of customs, and the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit on that duty.
Final Conclusion: The lower orders were set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption or credit-restricting notification expressly limits specified duties but omits additional duty of customs from the operative restriction, the omission must be given effect and the credit cannot be curtailed by implication.