Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of the entire pre-deposit in respect of the demand raised on Modvat credit taken on LSHS and furnace oil used in DG sets for generation of electricity used in the factory, and whether a partial pre-deposit should be directed having regard to the arguable nature of the claim and financial hardship.
Analysis: Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 at the relevant time extended Modvat benefit to inputs used as fuel in or in relation to manufacture of final products. The claim based on use of LSHS and furnace oil in DG sets for generation of electricity was treated as arguable, but the facts were distinguished from cases where fuel was directly used in the furnace for manufacture. The subsequent amendment by Notification No. 11/95-C.E. (N.T.) dated 16-3-1995 was also noticed. Balancing the prima facie case, the plea of financial hardship, and the interest of Revenue, complete waiver was not granted.
Conclusion: The appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs, and recovery of the remaining demand was stayed upon compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: In a stay application, where the claim on Modvat eligibility is only prima facie arguable, the Tribunal may grant only partial waiver of pre-deposit by balancing financial hardship against the interests of Revenue.