Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on inputs that had suffered duty before 31-1-1986, when the declaration had been filed under Rule 57G and the goods were received under subsidiary gate passes.
Analysis: The Modvat scheme was held to consist of several interrelated rules and had to be read as a whole. Credit on inputs already in stock or moving through the market before the introduction of Modvat was restricted by the prescribed cut-off date of 31-1-1986. Since the inputs in question had suffered duty in 1984 and were received only after a considerable time, the benefit could not be extended by reading Rule 57A in isolation from Rule 57H.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the disputed inputs, and the disallowance was upheld against the assessee.