Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported belt buckles were classifiable as "Metallic Embellishments other than zip fasteners" under Serial No. 10 of Notification No. 224/85-Cus. dated 9-7-1985 so as to qualify for exemption and refund of duty.
Analysis: The imported goods were belt buckles assessed under Heading 8308.90, and the dispute turned on whether they fell within the exemption entry covering metallic embellishments other than zip fasteners. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same product and held that metal buckles answered that description. As the issue was identical to the one already decided, the impugned order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The goods were held to fall within the exemption entry and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.