<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85766</link>
    <description>Imported belt buckles assessed under Heading 8308.90 were treated as falling within the exemption entry for &quot;metallic embellishments other than zip fasteners&quot; under Serial No. 10 of Notification No. 224/85-Cus., because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same product and held that metal buckles answered that description. On that basis, the denial of exemption and refund could not be sustained, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85766</link>
      <description>Imported belt buckles assessed under Heading 8308.90 were treated as falling within the exemption entry for &quot;metallic embellishments other than zip fasteners&quot; under Serial No. 10 of Notification No. 224/85-Cus., because the Tribunal followed its earlier ruling on the same product and held that metal buckles answered that description. On that basis, the denial of exemption and refund could not be sustained, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>