Modvat credit for integral television component upheld where the item was used in relation to manufacture, not judged by accessory status.

For Modvat credit under Rule 57A, the decisive test is whether an item is used in or in relation to manufacture of the final product; its label as an accessory or its functional indispensability is not conclusive. A toughened glass screen fitted to television sets, supplied as part of the product and included in its assessable value, was treated as an integral component used in manufacture. Credit was therefore admissible, and denial of Modvat credit was incorrect.

---

---

Issues: Whether the toughened glass screen fitted to the television sets manufactured by the assessee was an input eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The eligibility of Modvat credit turned on whether the goods were used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, not on whether they were indispensable to the working of the television or could be described as an accessory. Rule 57A was construed broadly and did not exclude components merely because they were not essential in a functional sense. The later amendment by Notification No. 28/95-C.E. dated 29-06-1995 expanded the scope of inputs and clarified the inclusion of accessories where their value formed part of the assessable value, but the pre-amendment rule itself did not support denial merely because the screen was said to be optional. On the facts, the screen was fitted to the cabinet, formed an integral part of the television, was compulsorily supplied, and its cost was included in the final product.

Conclusion: The toughened glass screen panes were inputs used in the manufacture of television sets and Modvat credit was admissible. Denial of credit was incorrect.

Ratio Decidendi: For Modvat purposes under Rule 57A, the decisive test is whether the item is used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product; its characterization as an accessory or its indispensability to the product's functioning is not conclusive.

---