Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of the disputed duty and penalty was justified pending appeal.
Analysis: The generating set was treated as goods for excise purposes notwithstanding its assembly at site and fixation to the ground. The set was found to have come into existence on the admitted date and to have been operational before the exemption date relied on by the appellant. The plea of inability to use the set without electrical permission and removal of defects was not accepted as a legal bar on the facts. On the question of financial hardship, no satisfactory material was produced to justify complete waiver, though the appellant's plea warranted partial relief.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined and a substantial deposit was directed, with the balance of duty and penalty waived pending appeal.
Final Conclusion: The application was allowed only to the extent of partial dispensation of the pre-deposit, and the appeal was kept pending subject to compliance with the deposit direction.