Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product "CAL-750" was classifiable as a food product under Tariff Item 1-B or Tariff Item 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff and whether it was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 234/82-C.E.
Analysis: The product was described as a slimming or weight-control preparation to be taken under medical advice, in fixed quantities, as a complete replacement of meals, and for a limited period to reduce obesity. In common parlance, a food is something taken to sustain oneself as ordinary nourishment. A product meant for medical supervision and used to cure obesity by replacing meals did not answer that description and was not a normal food or food preparation. Since it was not a food product, the claimed exemption for food products and food preparations was also unavailable.
Conclusion: The product was not a food product or food preparation and was correctly classified under Tariff Item 68. The exemption under Notification No. 234/82-C.E. was not admissible.
Ratio Decidendi: A preparation intended for slimming or therapeutic weight control, taken under medical advice as a meal replacement for a fixed period, is not a food product or food preparation in common parlance and is not entitled to an exemption meant for food products.