<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85062</link>
    <description>A slimming or weight-control preparation taken under medical advice as a complete meal replacement for a limited period did not qualify as a food product in common parlance because it was not ordinary nourishment. It was therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, and the exemption meant for food products and food preparations under Notification No. 234/82-C.E. was not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 15:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 251 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85062</link>
      <description>A slimming or weight-control preparation taken under medical advice as a complete meal replacement for a limited period did not qualify as a food product in common parlance because it was not ordinary nourishment. It was therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff, and the exemption meant for food products and food preparations under Notification No. 234/82-C.E. was not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>