Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revocation of the Customs House Agent licence was vitiated by violation of natural justice on account of reliance upon statements not relied on in the show cause notice and denial of cross-examination of the witnesses whose statements were relied upon.
Analysis: The show cause notice expressly relied upon specified statements, but the adjudicating authority founded its finding also on statements of loaders that were excluded from the notice. Where a notice confines the material on which the charge is made, the authority cannot rely on additional statements without putting the affected party on notice and affording an opportunity to meet them. Further, the appellant had sought cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses, including persons whose statements formed the basis of the allegation. The denial of cross-examination was not supported by any adequate showing that their attendance could not be procured, and no satisfactory reasons were recorded for dispensing with that right. In these circumstances, the order suffered from procedural unfairness and was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The impugned revocation order was held unsustainable for violation of principles of natural justice and denial of cross-examination.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication founded on material outside the show cause notice, coupled with unjustified denial of cross-examination of relied-upon witnesses, is vitiated for breach of natural justice.