Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether imported thin rubber abrasive cutting wheels were classifiable under sub-heading 6801.10 as grinding wheels and the like, or under sub-heading 6801.90 as others.
Analysis: The goods were examined in the light of the tariff description and the HSN Explanatory Notes. The expression "grinding wheels and the like" was treated as covering similar products used for grinding, cutting and allied operations, not only wheels used exclusively for grinding. On that basis, grinding wheels and cutting wheels were regarded as like goods for classification purposes, and the more specific sub-heading was preferred over the residuary entry. The request for technical reference was also found to have no bearing, since classification was for the customs authorities to determine.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under sub-heading 6801.10, and the assessee's claim under sub-heading 6801.90 was rejected.