TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner could sustain an addition made in assessment on a ground different from that adopted by the Income-tax Officer, and treat the cash credit as income from undisclosed sources even though the original addition was based on alleged inflation of purchase price.
Analysis: The appellate powers under section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 are plenary and conterminous with those of the Income-tax Officer. In dealing with an appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner may confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment, and his power is not confined to the precise reasoning adopted by the Income-tax Officer. Once the assessment is before him, he may examine every item or process that entered into the computation, and may sustain an addition on a different ground if the item was part of the assessment proceedings. The peak cash credit in the partner's account was one such item, and the appellate authority was therefore competent to sustain it as unexplained income from undisclosed sources.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner had jurisdiction to sustain the addition of Rs. 13,189 as income from undisclosed sources, and the answer was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: In an appeal under section 31 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner may sustain an addition on a ground different from that adopted by the Income-tax Officer, so long as the item falls within the subject-matter of the assessment before him.
TaxTMI 
