Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner could, while disposing of an assessee's appeal, enhance the assessment by bringing in income from a new source not processed by the Income-tax Officer or disclosed in the return or assessment order, under the 1922 Act and the 1961 Act.
Analysis: The statutory powers of enhancement under section 31(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and section 251(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were held to be in pari materia. The governing principle applied was that appellate enhancement is confined to the subject-matter of the assessment and to sources of income expressly or by clear implication considered by the Income-tax Officer from the point of view of taxability. The appellate authority cannot travel beyond the record to discover a fresh source of income not dealt with by the Income-tax Officer.
Conclusion: The Appellate Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to add income traced to undisclosed sources that were not considered by the Income-tax Officer. The answer is in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The additions made in appeal from undisclosed sources could not be sustained, and the writ petitions succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: The power of enhancement in income-tax appeals is restricted to the subject-matter of assessment and does not extend to assessing a new source of income not processed by the Income-tax Officer or disclosed in the return or assessment order.