Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the Customs House Agents licence under Regulation 21(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 was valid, and whether the order was vitiated for want of detailed reasons or absence of an immediate need for action.
Analysis: Regulation 21(2) confers wide discretionary power on the Collector to suspend a licence in appropriate cases where immediate action is necessary and an enquiry is pending or contemplated. In the context of such an interim and interlocutory power, the order need not contain a full discussion of the evidence or a final adjudication of the allegations, but it must disclose that the authority applied its mind and formed a prima facie satisfaction about the need for suspension. The order in question referred to the suspected involvement of the licence-holder in the attempted export of prohibited goods, and the surrounding record showed that investigation had already commenced. The lapse of time between seizure and suspension did not invalidate the action, as it indicated restraint rather than haste and was consistent with a prima facie assessment pending enquiry.
Conclusion: The suspension order was held to be in conformity with Regulation 21(2) and was not liable to be interfered with.