Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. dated 03-04-1986 for parts procured by them and used in the manufacture of sub-assemblies which were thereafter cleared as original equipment parts for tractors.
Analysis: The exemption was available to parts of tractors only if they were intended to be used as original equipment parts in the manufacture of tractors. On the facts found, the appellants were not themselves manufacturers of tractors and the parts procured by them were first used in the manufacture of sub-assemblies, which were then used as original equipment parts. The condition in the notification was therefore not satisfied. The Board circular dealing with in-factory sub-assemblies did not assist the appellants on the facts, and the cited precedent was held inapplicable.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available to the appellants, and the denial of benefit under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. was sustained.