<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83104</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. was confined to parts of tractors used as original equipment parts in the manufacture of tractors. The appellants procured parts and used them first in making sub-assemblies, which were then cleared as original equipment parts for tractors; because they were not themselves manufacturers of tractors and the parts were not directly used in tractor manufacture, the notification condition was not met. A Board circular on in-factory sub-assemblies did not aid the appellants on these facts, and the cited precedent was treated as inapplicable. The benefit of the exemption was therefore denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 191 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83104</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 239/86-C.E. was confined to parts of tractors used as original equipment parts in the manufacture of tractors. The appellants procured parts and used them first in making sub-assemblies, which were then cleared as original equipment parts for tractors; because they were not themselves manufacturers of tractors and the parts were not directly used in tractor manufacture, the notification condition was not met. A Board circular on in-factory sub-assemblies did not aid the appellants on these facts, and the cited precedent was treated as inapplicable. The benefit of the exemption was therefore denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>