Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants could be permitted to raise an additional ground at the appellate stage concerning the applicability of the correct customs exemption notification.
Analysis: The ground sought to be added was not a wholly new factual controversy but a legal plea arising from the record, namely that the refund claim had been made on the basis of the correct notification and that the authorities had failed to consider this specific contention. The matter was still connected with the merits of the pending classification and duty dispute, and the issue could be examined on the material already available. The governing approach was that a purely legal issue, capable of determination on the existing record, may be permitted to be raised even if not fully articulated earlier. Permission to raise the ground did not amount to acceptance of the ground on merits, which would be decided later in the appeal.
Conclusion: The additional ground was allowed to be raised.