Modvat credit survives fire loss where inputs were already issued into manufacture; reversal applies only to unissued stock.

Modvat credit on inputs issued into manufacture was not lost merely because the inputs were later destroyed in a fire. Rule 57F(3) was treated as allowing credit for inputs intended to be used in or in relation to manufacture, without requiring physical incorporation in the final product. Because the fire occurred after issue of the inputs and during the manufacturing process, Rule 57I(1)(i) and Rule 57I(2) were held inapplicable on those facts. Reversal was therefore confined to inputs that had not yet been issued for manufacture and were destroyed as unutilised stock.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit taken on inputs destroyed in a fire while they were already issued and in the process of manufacture could be retained, and whether reversal was permissible only for inputs not yet issued for manufacture.

Analysis: Rule 57F(3) permitted credit on inputs intended to be used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, and the entitlement did not depend on the inputs remaining physically incorporated in finished goods. The fire occurred after the inputs had been issued and had entered the manufacturing process, so the case was not one of unissued stock merely destroyed before use. The recovery provisions under Rule 57I(1)(i) and Rule 57I(2) were held inapplicable on the facts, because there was no basis to treat the credit as wrongly taken or the inputs as unaccounted for. Rule 49 was noted as supporting the general scheme that loss by fire may attract remission-type treatment, but not a blanket reversal of credit on inputs already used in manufacture.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to retain Modvat credit on inputs actually issued and damaged during manufacture. Reversal could be directed only in respect of inputs not yet issued for manufacture and destroyed in the fire.

---