Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of duty was admissible on finished goods damaged or destroyed by accident and whether the Modvat credit taken on inputs used in such goods was required to be reversed.
Analysis: The Tribunal accepted that the goods had been damaged or destroyed by accident and that the inputs had already been issued for manufacture, with no diversion of goods shown. It followed its earlier view that where destruction occurs by fire or similar accident during handling or storage, remission is available under the applicable rules and input credit is not liable to reversal merely because the finished goods were damaged. It also noted the Board circular clarifying eligibility for remission in cases of destruction or damage by fire or accident.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to remission of duty and was not required to reverse the Modvat credit. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.