Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether composite articles made of plastics along with non-plastic materials, where plastic predominates in weight and value, are eligible for exemption as articles of plastics under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The goods had already been treated as articles of plastics for tariff classification on the basis that plastic content predominated. The same characterization could not be denied for exemption purposes when the notification itself covered articles of plastics under the specified tariff heading. The Board's circular and the trade notice supported this view, and such interpretative instructions were relevant and to be given due weight. On that basis, the goods fell within the exemption entry for the relevant period.
Conclusion: The exemption was available to the goods under the relevant notification entries for the periods covered by the decision, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: Composite plastic goods with predominant plastic content were held entitled to exemption under the applicable notification entries, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where composite goods are classified as articles of plastics because plastic predominates, the same classification governs exemption under a notification framed by reference to that tariff heading unless the notification expressly excludes such goods.